Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /home/nowonder/forschung/aprove/satrung/aprove/lpar16/SK90SLASH2.59.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₃(g₁(x), y, y) -> g₁(f₃(x, x, y))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Non-Overlap Check

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₃(g₁(x), y, y) -> g₁(f₃(x, x, y))

Q is empty.

The TRS is non-overlapping. Hence, we can switch to innermost.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Non-Overlap Check

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₃(g₁(x), y, y) -> g₁(f₃(x, x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f₃(g₁(x0), x1, x1)

Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F₃(g₁(x), y, y) -> F₃(x, x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₃(g₁(x), y, y) -> g₁(f₃(x, x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f₃(g₁(x0), x1, x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Non-Overlap Check

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F₃(g₁(x), y, y) -> F₃(x, x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₃(g₁(x), y, y) -> g₁(f₃(x, x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f₃(g₁(x0), x1, x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be strictly oriented and are deleted.

F₃(g₁(x), y, y) -> F₃(x, x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least by weakly be oriented.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
F₃(x1, x2, x3) = F₁(x1)
g₁(x1) = g₁(x1)

Lexicographic Path Order [19].
Precedence:

g₁ > F₁

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Non-Overlap Check

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDPOrderProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₃(g₁(x), y, y) -> g₁(f₃(x, x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f₃(g₁(x0), x1, x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.